Friday, 5 December 2014

Gold Market To Keep An Eye On Dollar After Strong Jobs Data

By Debbie Carlson
The U.S. dollar climbed to its highest level since 2009 after a much higher-than-expected nonfarm payrolls report, and gold-market watchers said how much further the dollar climbs could influence the metal next week.
February gold futures fell Friday, settling at $1,190.40 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, up 1.27% on the week. March silver fell Friday, settling at $16.258 an ounce, up 4.5% on the week. 
In the Kitco News Gold Survey, out of 36 participants, 21 responded this week. Seven see prices up, while 10 see prices down and four see prices sideways or unchanged. Market participants include bullion dealers, investment banks, futures traders and technical-chart analysts.
Several market participants said they were impressed that gold did not sharply extend its losses after the jobs report. Gold prices dropped under $1,200 following a blowout November nonfarm payrolls report. The U.S. Labor Department said employers created 321,000 jobs, the biggest gain since January 2012, and far above economists’ expectations for about 230,000 new jobs. The previous two jobs reports saw upward revisions in employment gains, and wages also rose. The job gains in 2014 are the fastest rate since 1999.
“Gold instantly printed $10 lower as expectations are now that the Fed will start talking about the Fed funds going higher than expected - not generally a positive things for commodities,” said Steve Scacalossi, director, head of sales, global metals, TD Securities.
The U.S. dollar rose on the news, building on the gains seen Thursday when the dollar index rose above 89 for the first time since March 2009. Scacalossi said that level was the height of the post-global financial crisis rally.
Kevin Grady, owner, Phoenix Futures and Options, said gold is holding on better than he would have expected given the rise in the dollar and the fall in crude oil prices. Values were still weak; however, he said, gold prices should be down $25 an ounce given the news. What’s keeping the yellow metal from breaking further is strong buying interest under the market.
“There is a big buyer under the market. The fact that we had a huge jobs number, the dollar is up 600 points, the energy market is getting killed and gold is only off $12,” he said, adding that the strong buying at lower levels is keeping gold from falling further.
Some market watchers said while it’s admirable that gold did not sell off sharply when the jobs data came out, gold also struggles to extend its gains when it tests the upside of the current range.
Sean Lusk, director of the commercial hedging division at Walsh Trading, said he expects gold might test the bottom of the current range next week.
“Near term, gold is getting a little toppy here. There’s the (U.S.) dollar strength, weakness in crude. Prices should revert back to the downside, although we’ve seen a little uptick in physical (demand)…. We never really saw a follow-through push higher over $1,200. Part of that was waiting for today (and the jobs numbers),” he said.
The nonfarm payrolls data show the U.S. economy is improving slowly, he said. “We’re reaching an important threshold that the Fed (Federal Reserve) has put out there for the first Fed rate hike to happen,” Lusk said.
With this nonfarm payrolls report out of the way, Marc Chandler, global head of currency strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman, said for next week the job openings and labor turnover survey, known as the JOLTS report, will shed more light on the U.S. labor market.
This is a broader measure of the labor market and the Fed under Chair Janet Yellen puts a greater emphasis on this report, he said.
Analysts at Nomura said job openings rose by 821,000 so far this year and are above prerecession levels. “Although hiring continues to lag behind, we are starting to see some signs of a pickup, with hirings jumping to a near seven-year high in September…. Based on the reported increase in the share of firms with job openings not able to be filled in the October NFIB (National Federation of Independent Business) jobs report, there is a higher chance that the JOLTS measure of job openings will increase in October after declining in September.”
Other economic reports out next week are Thursday’s retail sales and Friday’s producer price index report. Nomura said higher vehicle sales in November should boost the headline retail sales figure, and lower gas prices could give consumers should more disposable income. The November PPI reading is expected to fall 0.1% because of lower farm and energy prices, they said.
By Debbie Carlson 
Why OPEC Will Tolerate Cheap Oil
By: 
 John Browne
Friday, December 5, 2014
Despite falling oil prices, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) voted on November 27th not to cut production in order to boost prices. The key to this decision appears to have been the attitude of Saudi Arabia, which has long been the first among equals in the coalition. Not surprisingly, the decision led to further oil price declines, and led many observers to conclude that OPEC has largely lost the ability to upwardly influence the price of petroleum. But this determination ignores the wider geopolitical considerations that may be convincing Saudi Arabia to be perfectly content, for now, with lower prices.
 
With about 20 percent of the world's proven oil reserves and producing between 10 and 13 percent of the global oil usage, Saudi Arabia is the world's leading oil producer ahead of the U.S., China, Iran and Canada. Perhaps more importantly, with its developed and easily accessible oil fields, Saudi Arabia has some of the lowest "lifting costs" in the world. Some estimate that it only costs the Saudis less than $5 to extract a barrel of oil from its fields. This is stark contrast to the much higher costs in rival countries and offshore and of shale producers. This permits the Saudis to withstand a protracted price slump far easier than other countries. The Saudis can use this ability as a weapon to achieve its strategic ends.
 
Modern U.S./Saudi relations were shaped towards the end of WWII by negotiations between President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Saudi King Ibn Saud. In return for Saudi cooperation over oil, the United States guaranteed Saudi Arabia military protection. Despite the clear ideological differences between a conservative Wahabbi Sunni Kingdom and a Western democracy, this policy has largely held for some 68 years. Saudi Arabia exercised moderation and consistency over oil supplies from the Arab Gulf. In return, the United States led an impressive Allied military defeat of an Iraqi threat to Saudi Arabia in Gulf War I.
 
While the current dip in energy prices clearly does hurt Saudi Arabia, it hurts her enemies far more, particularly Iran and Russia, which has been a key enabler of Iranian power and an international pariah on its own. Putting pressure on Russia has also become a key strategic interest of Washington.
 
For many oil exporting nations, the tax revenues generated from petroleum constitute a major portion of government budgets and have become essential to the maintenance of long-term solvency. Nations like Russia, with oil generating 50 percent of tax revenues in 2013, according to the Ministry of Finance, are assumed to have a 'Budget Break Even Cost' (BBEC) of around $105 per barrel based on Citi Research's data. Obviously the current price, less than $70 per barrel, is placing a great deal of strain on President Putin's finances. Iran has a BBEC of some $131 oil. Recovering from recent sanctions, Iran has few currency reserves. Therefore, oil at $70 will necessitate an early cut in government spending, risking civil discontent and possible regime change.
 
Saudi Arabia is assumed to have a lower BBEC of some $98 per barrel. And although current prices are lower than that, over decades Saudi Arabia has accumulated vast foreign exchange reserves. As a result, many observers believe she can sustain her economic budget for a considerable time with oil selling at below $93 a barrel. Meanwhile, countries such as Russia, Iran and, particularly, Venezuela, which already is nearing default on its debt, must start cutting government spending to reflect depleted oil revenues. These outcomes are firmly in the interests of both Saudi Arabia and her longtime strategic partner, the United States.
 
And although U.S. consumers are now enjoying the benefits of lower fuel costs, which will help spark consumer demand, the threat to the U.S. energy industry should not be overlooked. U.S. oil companies have invested heavily in horizontal oil drilling and so-called fracking to increase well yields. U.S. domestic oil production has risen significantly over the past five years and now approaches 8 million barrels per day based on data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). However, much of this investment was made on the basis of $100 oil. If the price stays below $70 for long, the continued viability of some smaller U.S. oil companies might be threatened, particularly in Texas and South Dakota. Citigroup Inc.'s recent forecast that the U.S. would pump 14.2 million barrels per day by 2020 could prove illusive and result in job losses.
 
However, there are more serious strategic concerns currently in play. The Obama Administration's recent engagement with Iran may be of great concern to the Saudis, who consider Iran to be a mortal threat. Currently, the U.S. and Iran are in protracted negotiations over Iranian nuclear capabilities. The U.S. appears to be willing to acquiesce to Iranian desires in exchange for more cooperation against ISIS.
 
These concerns may have escalated this week when it was announced that Iran had recently conducted air strikes against ISIS insurgents within Iraqi territory. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry reacted to these revelations as a "welcome development." Although ISIS should be considered an enemy to both the U.S. and Iran, American acceptance of Iranian military intervention in Iraq can be seen as a clear shift in Washington's policy towards Tehran.
 
If such is the case, the Saudis may begin to feel 'dumped' by Obama, and may be tempted to turn more forcefully towards China, the world's largest oil importer, offering cheap oil in return for strategic protection against a new American-backed Iranian regional threat.
 
The effects of international recession and the U.S. 'oil boom' were slow to create a production glut because, until recently, production from Iran, Russia, Iraq and Libya was curtailed by sanctions and war. Cheap oil likely will protect and increase Saudi Arabia's oil market share.
 
The real costs of Obama's dropping the U.S.'s 68-year friendship with Saudi Arabia in favor of Iran are becoming increasingly apparent. If Saudi Arabia is forced closer to China, taking with her other Arab Gulf States (OAPEC), the long-range implications could be extremely serious for America and Europe.

Precious Metals: Volume Must Be Respected

Morris Hubbartt
trading@superforcesignals.com
trading@superforce60.com
Super Force Precious Metals Video Analysis
posted Dec 5, 2014


"Our main format is now video analysis..."
Friday, Dec 5, 2014 Super Force Signals special offer for 321Gold Readers:
Send an email to trading@superforcesignals.com and I’ll send you 3 of my next Super Force Surge Signals free of charge, as I send them to paid subscribers. Thank you!

The SuperForce Proprietary SURGE index SIGNALS:
25 Surge Index Buy or 25 Surge Index Sell: Solid Power.
50 Surge Index Buy or 50 Surge Index Sell: Stronger Power.
75 Surge Index Buy or 75 Surge Index Sell: Maximum Power.
100 Surge Index Buy or 100 Surge Index Sell: "Over The Top" Power.

Stay alert for our surge signals, sent by email to subscribers, for both the daily charts on Super Force Signals at 
www.superforcesignals.com and for the 60 minute charts atwww.superforce60.com

About Super Force Signals
:
Our Surge Index Signals are created thru our proprietary blend of the highest quality technical analysis and many years of successful business building. We are two business owners with excellent synergy. We understand risk and reward. Our subscribers are generally successfully business owners, people like yourself with speculative funds, looking for serious management of your risk and reward in the market.

Frank Johnson: Executive Editor, Macro Risk Manager.
Morris Hubbartt: Chief Market Analyst, Trading Risk Specialist.

Gold Shorting Exhaustion

Adam Hamilton
Archives
Dec 05, 2014

Gold's been on an incredible roller-coaster ride over the past couple months, whipsawing like crazy. And contrary to popular rationalizations, these swings had absolutely nothing to do with fundamentals. Their sole driver has been American speculators' extreme shorting of gold futures, which has battered gold's price around in the absence of investment demand. But this epic gold shorting looks exhausted.
The core mission of all trading, whether long-term investing or rapid-fire speculation, is buying low and selling high. That's the only way to multiply wealth in the financial markets. Short sellers execute this same strategy, but reverse the order. They borrow assets they don't own, sell them presumably high, and later hopefully buy them back low to repay their debts. The key to shorting is selling high, not selling low.
And that makes the recent gold action perplexing. As of mid-August, American speculators' total gold-futures short positions were almost back down to normal. Gold was trading just over $1300, which sure wasn't high by recent standards. Gold had averaged $1669 in 2012 and $1409 in 2013, and was still deep in cyclical-bear-market territory with a 30.9% loss over 3.0 years since its August 2011 secular-bull high.
Yet American speculators still decided to aggressively borrow and sell gold futures, a spree that would snowball into an exceedingly extreme shorting episode. Some catalysts certainly contributed. A record rally in the US dollar was getting underway, spooking many futures speculators into dumping gold. Meanwhile that crazy Fed-spawned US stock-market levitationcontinued killing demand for alternative investments.
These coupled with American futures speculators' extremely bearish bias on gold unleashed a deluge of gold selling, the vast majority on the short side. Futures trading is an exceedingly unforgiving game, with super-dangerous inherent leverage. Every futures contract controls 100 troy ounces of gold, which is worth $120k at the $1200 gold prices today. Yet the margin required to hold each contract is merely $4k now.
So futures speculators running minimum margin can wield incredible 30x leverage to the gold price. That compares to the legal limit in the stock markets continuously since 1974 of just 2x! At 30x leverage, a mere 3.3% adverse move in the gold price would wipe out 100% of the capital risked by speculators. The risks involved in gold-futures trading are just mind-boggling, greatly limiting the number of willing participants.
Short selling obviously makes the most sense for high-priced euphoric markets that have been rallying for years. That's the highest-probability-for-success time to sell high. But gold is the exact opposite, a low-priced despairing market that's been falling for years. It takes cast-iron hubris to make leveraged downside bets on a market that is already extremely low and universally loathed, it's certainly not prudent.
Thus gold-futures short selling is finite and self-limiting. There are only so many speculators out there willing to borrow already-dirt-cheap-and-despised assets in a risky leveraged attempt to sell them high. And the lower this short selling batters prices, the more the desire to keep shorting wanes. Lower prices squeeze out profit opportunities for speculators, and entice already-short traders to cover and realize their profits.
So short selling always runs in relatively-short spurts, ramping up fast but quickly peaking in selling exhaustion. And I suspect that's exactly what's happening in gold now. This past weekend, the short sellers had a perfect catalyst to keep selling aggressively. The citizens of Switzerland voted down that referendum that would have forced their national central bank to engage in massive new gold buying.
Yet rather than plunge on that bearish news, gold instead rocketed 3.8% higher the next trading day! In this dark sentiment wasteland with investors missing in action, that had to be driven by major short covering by American futures speculators. We won't know for sure until a few hours after this essay is published, as late Friday afternoons are when the CFTC releases its famous Commitments of Traders reports.
These CoTs detail aggregate long and short futures positions held by hedgers and speculators, current to the preceding Tuesdays. While hedgers use the futures markets to lock in prices for commodities that they physically use in their businesses, speculators are purely gaming price moves. And with investors largely absent, American futures speculators have been utterly dominating recent years' gold-price action.
This first chart looks at this group of traders' total long and short positions held in gold-futures contracts over the past couple years, per the weekly CoTs. The gold price is superimposed on top, revealing the nearly-perfect inverse correlation between gold levels and American futures speculators' total shorts. When they sell short, gold drops on the additional "supply". Then when they buy to cover, gold surges.
Exactly a month ago, gold plunged to a deep new 4.6-year low just over $1140. As this chart makes crystal-clear, the driver was extreme short selling by American futures speculators. That week they were ramping their total gold-futures shorts to at least 162.5k contracts. I say at least because the CoT reads are as of Tuesdays only, so within that hyper-bearish gold-low CoT week they were likely even higher!
Even on this short-term chart, the outsized massiveness of that short selling is readily evident. At Zeal our weekly CoT data goes back to January 1999, deep in gold's last secular bear. And in the entire 15.9-year span since, there's only been one other episode of greater speculator short selling. And that happened following gold's worst quarter in 93 years in 2013's second quarter, a once-in-a-century selling anomaly.
After gold plummeted 22.8% that quarter, speculators got so caught up in the extreme bearishness that they sold their way to a staggering 178.9k gold-futures short contracts. That was the greatest levels of speculator shorting by far since at least early 1999, and likely ever. American futures speculators had never been more convinced that gold would keep on spiraling lower, and their leveraged downside bets proved it.
Yet they were dead wrong. One of the most ironic things about futures speculators is they aren't very smart as a herd. You'd think such a sophisticated group of traders would understand psychology better, that buying low and selling high is effectively the same as buying fear and selling greed. Yet in gold they keep on choosing to sell fear, to sell low. Their bets are the most bearish right as gold is bottoming.
Gold-futures speculators' total positions, especially their shorts, are a strong contrarian indicator for gold. Major new gold rallies and uplegs are born right when speculators' leveraged downside bets happen to be peaking. Interestingly these excessive shorts are actually the main reason gold bottoms and soon rallies. Speculators have to buy gold futures to offset and cover their shorts, and that demand sparks upside action.
From shorts' probably-all-time record high in July 2013, the speculators' short covering took 16 weeks. And concurrent with that span, gold powered 12.8% higher even in the absence of investment demand and the ongoingextreme liquidations in GLD shares. Short covering is a powerful upside driver for gold prices for months at a time, which is certainly a very bullish omen after the recent speculator short-selling peak.
Before this latest speculator gold-futures shorting binge, the gold price was stable all year near $1300. But between mid-August and mid-November, American futures speculators alone borrowed to sell another 90.6k contracts. This ballooned their total short position by a staggering 126% in just 13 weeks! No wonder gold prices were so weak in recent months in the face of such a massive deluge of new supply.
This speculator short selling alone over that little span was the equivalent of 281.9 metric tons of gold, which works out to 21.7t per week. This was just too much gold too fast for the markets to absorb. Per the World Gold Council, global investment demand in the first three quarters of 2014 averaged about 18.2t per week. So American futures speculators' extreme short selling alone overwhelmed world demand.
Without that shorting binge, gold's major support zone around $1200 never would've failed 5 weeks ago. And the sentiment scene in gold would feel considerably less universally bearish today. But the great thing about futures short selling is all those leveraged downside bets legally soon have to be covered. Futures trading is a zero-sum game, so futures exchanges enforce margin rules with an iron fist.
When gold rallies and moves against speculators' short positions, they soon have to close them out or risk facing margin calls and catastrophic losses greater than their capital risked. The only way to cover and close a futures short is to buy an offsetting long contract. This has an identical price impact on gold as a bullish speculator buying a new long-side contract. So the higher the shorts, the bigger the coming buying pressure.
After what's almost certainly the second-most-extreme episode of speculator gold-futures shorting in all of history, there's going to be lots of buying coming. We're already seeing it. In the latest CoT week before this essay was published, positions as of Tuesday November 25th, American futures speculators bought to cover 18.5k short contracts. That magnitude of short covering is pretty rare even in recent years.
Since the Fed's artificial stock-market levitation started crushing gold in early 2013, there have been 99 CoT weeks. And including this latest one, only 6 saw short covering exceed 18k contracts. And odds are that is just the beginning, that there is a lot more buying to come. Since 2013 proved an extremely-anomalous year for gold, its last normal years were 2009 to 2012. That's a baseline gold will inevitably return to.
During that last normal span, American speculators' total gold-futures shorts averaged 65.4k contracts. So merely to return to such reasonable levels, this one group of traders still needs to buy to cover 66.4k more contracts or the equivalent of 206.5 tonnes of gold! And since short covering feeds on itself as resulting rallying prices force other shorts to cover, major short-covering rallies tend to unfold within several months.
And speculators' extreme and irrational bearishness with gold already so beaten down has not only manifested in their short positions, but their longs too. As the next chart shows, in that normal baseline period from 2009 to 2012 before the Fed's QE3 manipulations speculators' total gold-futures longs averaged 288.5k contracts. Today even though we've seen steady long-side buying all year, they're down at 200.3k.
To merely mean revert back to normal and reasonable levels, speculators will have to buy another 88.2k long gold-futures contracts. That equates toanother 274.5t of gold! Together with the short-side mean-reversion buying, speculators would have to buy gold-futures contracts controlling 481.0t of gold to return to normal-year levels. That's well over half of total global investment demand last year, a vast amount!
The total deviation of both speculators' longs and shorts from their 2009-to-2012 averages is shown by the yellow line in these charts. And in this latest CoT week even after the short-selling exhaustion and rapid initial covering, this deviation still remains very high. That represents massive mean-reversion buying still left to be done as the epically-bearish sentiment plaguing gold inevitably gradually dissipates.
This next chart extends the same data back years earlier, giving some essential context illustrating just how extreme American speculators' gold-futures bets are these days. Speculators' longs are way too low in historical context, and their shorts far too high, even given today's gold levels and the weak price action of the past couple of years. 2013's extreme Fed-driven anomaly simply can't and won't last forever.
Thanks to the Fed's implied backstop of the stock markets with its QE3 bond-monetizing campaign and all the related jawboning, investorsabandoned alternative investments in early 2013. Gold can't suffer its worst quarter in 93 years very often, such events are exceedingly rare by their very nature. That once-in-a-lifetime selloff helped catapult speculators' gold-futures shorts to their highest levels since 1999, if not ever.
It's kind of understandable that emotional futures speculators would get caught up in the epic levels of bearishness such an extreme selloff spawned. But to see similar levels of gold-futures shorting a few CoT weeks ago after gold had essentially stabilized for over an entire year? Supreme irrationality, surely the pinnacle of bearish bandwagon groupthink. There was no justification for such extreme shorting.
Collective sentiment, traders' greed and fear, drives short-term trading in gold and everything else. And these perpetually-warring emotions are like the opposite ends of a giant pendulum's arc. Fear can only get so great, the pendulum can only swing so high, before everyone susceptible to being scared or duped into selling low has already sold. And that leaves only buyers so the pendulum starts swinging back towards greed.
This should already be underway in gold. Even though that "Save Our Swiss Gold" referendum voted on in Switzerland last weekend was widely expected to fail, traders universally believed its defeat would lead to another serious round of new gold selling. Yet on that very news that should have encouraged the hyper-bearish futures speculators, they aggressively bought to cover. Short selling has to be exhausted.
This has hugely bullish implications for gold and the entire precious-metals complex. For the better part of two years now, traders have been universally betting that gold is dead as an asset class. As the Fed-inflated stock markets relentlessly powered higher to dizzying heights, they forgot that stock markets move up and down. Bulls are inevitably followed by bears, which prudent portfolio diversification protects from.
At some point likely very soon here, these overextended, overvalued, and euphoric stock markets are going to decisively roll over. And with the new bond buying from the Fed's QE3 campaign gone, and launching QE4 apolitical impossibility with the new Republican Congress, the Fed won't be there to arrest the next material selloff. It's going to snowball, and all of a sudden legions of investors will remember gold.
Gold, and all its derivatives from the popular GLD gold ETF to the stocks of the gold miners, are going to catch a massive bid. Gold is one of the very few proven performers during general-stock bear markets. And with bearishness so extreme and its price so irrationally low, the capital inflows from investors starting to return will have no problem catapulting gold much higher in relatively short order. A huge upleg draws nigh!
And that brings us full circle to the mission of trading, buying low and selling high. American futures speculators are again making the same stubborn mistake they do at all major gold lows, borrowing gold to sell it low. But after a price has fallen on balance for years and just hit a major new multi-year low, and consensus bearishness is overwhelming, it seems far wiser to fight the crowd and buy low rather than sell low.
At Zeal we've been doing just that this year. We're lifelong hardcore contrarian traders who walk the walk. We buy low when few others will in order to later sell high when everyone comes around and gets excited. And in these dangerous lofty stock markets, the precious-metals sector is the cheapest and most despised by far. So there's nothing else that has such awesome upside potential in the coming years.
We can help you multiply your wealth as this crazy gold anomaly mean reverts far higher. We publish acclaimed weekly and monthly newsletters for contrarian speculators and investors. They draw on our decades of hard-won experience, knowledge, wisdom, and ongoing research to explain what's happening in the markets, why, and how to trade them with specific stocks.Subscribe today! We also do deep research into precious-metals stocks to uncover our fundamental favorites, which are detailed in comprehensive reportsBuy yours now and get deployed before gold stocks inevitably soar.
The bottom line is gold's recent support breakdown was driven solely by extreme shorting by American futures speculators. And that orgy of short selling recently peaked at the second highest levels of speculator shorts since 1999, if not ever. And instead of selling aggressively after the failure of that Swiss gold referendum, speculators scrambled to buy to cover despite the perfect downside catalyst.

That almost certainly means the recent extreme futures shorting is exhausted. All traders with enough hubris to make leveraged downside bets on gold near major multi-year lows did it, and now they have to buy to cover. And we are talking about hundreds of tonnes of gold here, vast amounts. Extreme shorts are always very bullish because they soon must be covered, and that overdue buying has already begun.

Merk InsightsWhat's Next for the Dollar and Gold?

Axel Merk
Merk Hard Currency Fund
Posted Dec 5, 2014

Who would have predicted oil prices in the sixty-dollar range a year ago? Something is not right about these markets. Our take: don’t get burned when markets add fuel to the fire. Here’s what to watch out for as we head into 2015; ignore at your own peril.
The world isn’t running out of oil, but out of cheap oil. Therefore the fundamentals don’t support oil trading in the $60s. As oil prices have plunged from over $100 to just over $60 a barrel, it appears to us the market is driven by a combination of the following:
• The global economy is experiencing a severe slowdown;
• Major liquidity providers have left the market; and/or
• Technicals rather than fundamentals are in charge

Europe can’t get back on its feet with sanctions imposed on Russia (hint to European Central Bank head Draghi: printing money can’t fix this). China’s economy is in transition with significant headwinds coming from a housing bubble that’s deflating. In the U.S., we are made to believe our recovery is getting ever stronger; the energy markets appear to disagree.
The large moves we have seen in some markets of late – most notably in oil futures – may well also be a reflection that banks are no longer “risk takers” in these markets; the law of unintended consequences has removed these very large liquidity providers. Investors shouldn’t be surprised that moves have become more volatile.
The media attributes the drastic drop in oil prices to OPEC’s decision not to limit production. OPEC’s meeting last week might have been a catalyst, but fundamentals did not change radically enough to justify the dramatic decline. Some say commodity prices tend to be driven more by technicals, and we don’t disagree. We take it a step further, though, arguing all markets are ever more removed from fundamentals.
Ready to Ignite?
What’s happening in the oil markets is a symptom of what’s happening in all markets. Our long-term readers know that we have been most concerned about complacency in the markets: complacency is the absence of fear. In the equity markets, the VIX index measuring volatility is a good barometer of complacency. In our analysis, complacency on the backdrop of rising asset prices is a problem. It’s a problem because investors bidding up such asset prices are not appreciative of the inherent risks they are taking on. As fear comes back into the market, such investors can be gone in a heartbeat, as they suddenly realize their investments expose them to greater risk than they bargained for. In our assessment, an equity market that has relentlessly risen on the backdrop of low volatility is a box of tinder waiting to be lit.
Volatility has crept back into the markets, although casual observers might not have noticed. First, there was the equity market that briefly acted up in late September / early October. Pundits write this episode off as old history. Indeed, even we said a possible market crash is put on hold after Japan announced its $1.2 trillion pension fund would invest hundreds of billions in foreign equity markets. As we wrote in a recent analysis, this policy may only provide short-lived support to the markets and be ultimately a net negative for Japanese investors.
Since then, other markets have thrown mini-tantrums. Be that in the currency markets where we’ve seen big swings in select currencies to the commodity markets. But while the Russian ruble has been on a nosedive and other commodity currencies have suffered in the most recent bout, the spikes in volatility have not always been in the most obvious places. To us this suggests not all is well in the markets.
And then came the rout in commodities, at first also pulling down gold. But gold – at least as of this writing – is staging a furious comeback.
And conspicuously absent: a correction in the S&P. To understand why, consider that the global storyline has been that the U.S. is the one place in the world that’s recovering. Investors around the globe see the glass half empty, but have been told that there’s this one place where the glass is half full. And sure enough, they buy US equities, pushing up the U.S. dollar in the process. And why not, the Fed is the one central bank that’s embarking on a tightening course.
Except that we think foreign investors are the new retail. Retail investors have long left this market; some say we can’t have a market top if they haven’t joined the frenzy. Trouble is, they have no money to join the frenzy. But foreign investors were not only late in gobbling up toxic Asset Backed Securities (ABS) in 2007, they have bought into conventional wisdom, driving U.S. equity prices higher in recent months.
Pinch Me…
Except, of course, conventional wisdom is rarely right when it comes to the markets. Investors that have had too much Kool-Aid may want to consider:
  • As volatility is making the rounds in currency and commodity markets, it may only be a matter of time before it reaches equity markets. When it happens, brace yourself, as the long overdue correction may finally take place. The longer it goes the more likely a correction turns into a crash.
  • The Fed has already been back peddling on its hawkish talk. In the meantime, forward inflation indicators have plunged – including those that ought to be less sensitive to changes in commodity prices.
While some pundits will interpret any less hawkish tone from the Fed as another rallying cry to buy more equities, if you agree to what we have outlined above, don’t bet your house on it. Quite the contrary:
  • The U.S. was the only major country that was expected to tighten. If this needs to be re-priced, it could bring the greenback back to earth.
  • Note that in recent months, higher equity prices have been correlated with a stronger dollar. Conversely, do not count on the dollar playing “safe haven” currency if the equity market tumbles.
  • The ECB is now aggressively talking about QE now that forward inflation expectations have come down. Trouble is that even if the ECB were to buy sovereign bonds, it is doubtful that it will be enough to increase those inflation expectations. What Draghi needs is to have fewer geopolitical headwinds. Those may well come as German chancellor Merkel has made some first comments that appear to be aimed at diffusing the standoff in Ukraine. Aside from lackluster demand, European banks continue to have some challenges; Super Mario (Draghi) can help, but not work miracles.
  • Gold has had a low correlation to equity markets in the long-term. We continue to believe investors consider gold as a diversifier in an era when real interest rates are negative and may well continue to be negative for some time. In fact, we have repeatedly said we don’t think the U.S. can afford positive real interest rates for an extended period – not now, and not a decade from now. Negative real interest rates are supportive to the price of gold, as the shiny brick pays no interest - which may be better than losing money on a real basis holding the greenback.
  • Japan’s economy is a hopeless case, but Prime Minister Abe is doing his best to accelerate Japan’s demise. Having said that, the Japanese yen could well have a substantial rally even if our long-term outlook is very negative. Although we note that the yen has shown very little motivation to rally on minor corrections. We don’t look at the yen as a ‘safe haven’ currency anymore. Instead, when the yen rallies in a “risk off” environment, it’s a sign that people have lost faith Abe will pursue his policies; the moment investors believe Abe is powerful enough to pursue his agenda, the yen appears to lose any ‘safe haven’ characteristics. As such, we remain rather bearish on the yen.
  • With regard to other major currencies, their central bankers have all tried very hard to talk them down. In Australia, barely a day appears to go by without some official saying the Aussie is overvalued. How much jawboning can the markets take? The Aussie’s fate will ultimately depend on how China is doing, not words of policy makers.
  • China’s economy has been weakening. However, given that China has a current account surplus, we do not equate a weakening Chinese economy with a weakening currency. Quite the opposite may well happen, just as in Japan – formerly with a strong current account surplus - the yen used to appreciate when there were bad economic data. China is going through a major transformation. Much of the Chinese yuan’s fate may well depend on how the central bank will play its hand. For now, yields in CNY denominated securities are much higher than in the U.S.; with the U.S. stepping back on its tightening bias, relatively high yielding CNY denominated assets may continue to be attractive.
In summary, as we look ahead, this may well be the time to be cautious. Investors continue to be scared that they might miss another rally. Indeed, late phases in a bull market can lead to spectacular gains. The temptations are certainly there. As John Hussman has said: you can either be a fool before or after a bubble bursts. To us, this means only put money at risk you can afford to lose. Except, of course, that there is no place to hide when real interest rates are negative, as cash is at risk of losing its purchasing power.
Investors may want to look at investing the way institutional investors do: they have a risk budget. Look at what your risk budget is, then allocate it wisely. Look for true diversification. For more on our 2015 outlook and how to prepare for what’s ahead, please register to join me onThursday, December 11, for our Webinar. In the meantime, follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/AxelMerk for my most up-to-date thoughts on the dollar, currencies and gold.
If you haven’t done so, also make sure you sign up for Merk Insights to receive analyses like this one straight to your mailbox.

Hindenburg Omen cries bear market, again

The Hindenburg Omen, which is supposed to warn of an impending stock market crash, is crying wolf—or bear market, in this case -- but investors don’t seem to care.
And why should they? The bulk of the previous sightings of the infamous technical indicator, which was created by the late Jim Miekka, have failed to lead to any weakness at all, much less a bear market.
A new Hindenburg Omen appeared after the market closed on Tuesday, according to Tom McClellan, who writes the investment newsletter McClellan Market Report. Meanwhile, the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.33%  edged higher in afternoon trading on Wednesday. The benchmark was on track to close at an all-time high for the 33rd time this year, despite multiple Hindenburg Omen appearances over the last 12 months.
What if the Hindenburg Omen is right this time?
But before investors pooh-pooh the latest appearance out of hand, they should keep in mind that the indicator with the ominous-sounding name wasn’t designed to predict a crash, only warn that it’s possible. As chart above shows, each significant selloff over the past 30 years was preceded by the appearance of Hindenburg Omen.
“There are far more Hindenburg signals than there are scary declines,” McClellan said. “But it has a pretty good track record of appearing ahead of the major price declines.”
Miekka once likened his indicator to a funnel cloud -- they don’t always become devastating tornadoes, but that doesn’t mean investors shouldn’t take cover.
“We don’t think this particular instance of a Hindenburg Omen is going to turn into a big selloff,” McClellan said, given the market is entering the strongest period of seasonality.
Basically, investors who ignore the Hindenburg Omen’s latest warning will probably be right to do so. But at some point, the law of averages will catch up to them.
The Oil-Drenched Black Swan, Part 1  


Given the presumed 17% expansion of the global economy since 2009, the tiny increases in production could not possibly flood the world in oil unless demand has cratered.

The term Black Swan shows up in all sorts of discussions, but what does it actually mean? Though the term has roots stretching back to the 16th century, today it refers to author Nassim Taleb's meaning as defined in his books, Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets and The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable:

"First, it is an outlier, as it lies outside the realm of regular expectations, because nothing in the past can convincingly point to its possibility. Second, it carries an extreme 'impact'. Third, in spite of its outlier status, human nature makes us concoct explanations for its occurrence after the fact, making it explainable and predictable."
Simply put, black swans areundirected and unpredicted. The Wikipedia entry lists three criteria based on Taleb's work:
1. The event is a surprise (to the observer).

2. The event has a major effect.
3. After the first recorded instance of the event, it is rationalized by hindsight, as if it could have been expected; that is, the relevant data were available but unaccounted for in risk mitigation programs.
It is my contention that the recent free-fall in the price of oil qualifies as a financial Black Swan. Let's go through the criteria:
1. How many analysts/pundits predicted the 37% decline in the price of oil, from $105/barrel in July to $66/barrel at the end of November? Perhaps somebody predicted a 37% drop in oil in the span of five months, but if so, I haven't run across their prediction.
For context, here is a chart of crude oil from 2010 to the present. Note that price has crashed through the support that held through the many crises of the past four years. The conclusion that this reflects a global decline in demand that characterizes recessions is undeniable.
I think we can fairly conclude that this free-fall in the price of oil qualifies as an outlieroutside the realm of regular expectations, unpredicted and unpredictable.
Why was it unpredictable? In the past, oil spikes tipped the global economy into recession. This is visible in this chart of oil since 2002; the 100+% spike in oil from $70+/barrel to $140+/barrel in a matter of months helped push the global economy into recession.
The mechanism is common-sense: every additional dollar that must be spent on energy is taken away from spending on other goods and services. As consumption tanks, over-extended borrowers and lenders implode, "risk-on" borrowing and speculation dry up and the economy slides into recession.
But the current global recession did not result from an oil spike. Indeed, oil prices have been trading in a narrow band for several years, as we can see in this chart from the Energy Information Agency (EIA) of the U.S. government.
Given the official denial that the global economy is recessionary, it is not surprising that the free-fall in oil surprised the official class of analysts and pundits. Since declaring the global economy is in recession is sacrilege, it was impossible for conventional analysts/pundits to foresee a 37% drop in oil in a few months.
As for the drop in oil having a major impact: we have barely begun to feel the full consequences. But even the initial impact--the domino-like collapse of the commodity complex--qualifies.
I will address the financial impacts tomorrow, but rest assured these may well dwarf the collapse of the commodity complex.
As for concocting explanations and rationalizations after the fact, consider the shaky factual foundations of the current raft of rationalizations. The primary explanation for the free-fall in oil is rising production has created a temporary oversupply of oil: the world is awash in crude oil because producers have jacked up production so much.
Even the most cursory review of the data finds little support for this rationalization. According to the EIA, the average global crude oil production (including OPEC and all non-OPEC) per year is as follows:
2008: 74.0 million barrels per day (MBD)
2009: 72.7 MBD
2010: 74.4 MBD
2011: 74.5 MBD
2012: 75.9 MBD
2013: 76.0 MBD
2014: 76.9 MBD
The EIA estimates the global economy expanded by an average of 2.7% every year in this time frame. Thus we can estimate in a back-of-the-envelope fashion that oil consumption and production might rise in parallel with the global economy.
In the six years from 2009 to 2014, oil production rose 3.9%, from 74 MBD to 76.9 MBD.Meanwhile, cumulative global growth at 2.7% annually added 17.3% to the global economy in the same six-year period. What is remarkable is not the extremely modest expansion of oil production but how this modest growth apparently enabled a much larger expansion of the global economy. ( Other sources set the growth of global GDP in excess of 20% over this time frame.)
Global petroleum and other liquids reflects a similar modest expansion: from 89.1 MBD in 2012 to 91.4 MBD in 2014.
Given the presumed 17% to 20+% expansion of the global economy since 2009, the small increases in production could not possibly flood the world in oil unless demand has cratered. The "we're pumping so much oil" rationalizations for the 37% free-fall in oil don't hold up.
That leaves a sharp drop in demand and the rats fleeing the sinking ship exit from "risk-on" trades as the only explanations left. We will discuss these later in the week.
Those who doubt the eventual impact of this free-fall drop in oil prices might want to review The Smith Uncertainty Principle (yes, it's my work):
Every sustained action has more than one consequence. Some consequences will appear positive for a time before revealing their destructive nature. Some will be foreseeable, some will not. Some will be controllable, some will not. Those that are unforeseen and uncontrollable will trigger waves of other unforeseen and uncontrollable consequences."
I call your attention to the last line, which I see as being most relevant to the full impact of oil's free-fall.