Wednesday, 14 January 2015

Gyrations


Gold found some upside impetus early in the day before falling. It bounced up to 1245 before settling down for a small loss during afternoon trading. Silver prices were hit by a round of profit-taking only a day after gold experienced the same impulse. The gray metal is off over 1%.
The muscular uptick in oil helped temper enthusiasm for gold. It also helped to trim losses on the equities exchanges. Lackluster retail sales also dragged down the Dow and S&P, although stocks were down globally as investors are trying to scope out exactly where the world economy is headed in 2015.
They’re not coming up with any definitive answers.
It’s no wonder. Everywhere mixed messages are being transmitted o the trading communities. China is slowing down in manufacturing, but exports soared. Inventory reduction? The U.S. is seeing solid employment gains but retail sales disappointed, falling almost 1% for December year-on-year. Japan remains stuck in the doldrums and Europe lacks vision and will, although Germany, and surprisingly Great Britain remain solid players, even if growth is a tad slow.
Yet the Japanese yen is being perceived as the safe haven of choice these days, hurting gold’s comeback.
Moreover, the World Bank on Tuesday lowered its global growth forecast for 2015 and 2016 citing disappointing economic prospects in the euro zone, Japan and some major emerging economies that offset the benefit of lower oil prices. The only BRIC country showing robust growth is India, but India has a long way up to go, so that’s no surprise.
We are liable to hear more calls from Europe to ease the sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine impasse. Of course, those calls may be buried under the avalanche of work that needs to be done on the continent concerning the latest terror threat. We still predict military action in Yemen. It’s gotten out of hand.
We are also unsure of oil’s stability. More softness will begin to pinch the equities in the U.S. even more, and soon may hurt employment. The oil patch and its associated industries provide a good chunk of jobs, almost all of which are well paid.

Wishing you as always, good trading,
Gary Wagner

Gold stocks during an equity bear market

Steve Saville

The historical record indicates that the gold-mining sector performs very well during the first 18-24 months of a general equity bear market as long as the average gold-mining stock is not 'overbought' and over-valued at the beginning of the bear market. Unfortunately, the historical sample size is small. In fact, since the birth of the current monetary system there have been only two relevant cases.
The first case involves the general equity bear market that began in January of 1973 and continued until late-1974. This bear market resulted in peak-to-trough losses of around 50% for the senior US stock indices.
The following chart comparison of the Barrons Gold Mining Index (BGMI) and the S&P500 Index shows that the gold-mining sector commenced a strong upward trend near the start of the general equity bear market. During the bear market's first 20 months, the BGMI gained about 300%.
The second case involves the general equity bear market that began in September of 2000 and continued until early-2003. This bear market also resulted in peak-to-trough losses of around 50% for the senior US stock indices.
The following chart comparison of the HUI and the NYSE Composite Index (NYA) shows that the gold-mining sector commenced a strong upward trend about 2.5 months after the start of the general equity bear market. Despite the fact that the HUI suffered a substantial percentage decline during this 2.5-month period, it still managed to gain about 200% over the course of the bear market's first 20 months.
The gold-mining sector is currently a long way from being 'overbought' and over-valued. In fact, by some measures it was recently as 'oversold' as it ever gets. The historical cases cited above would therefore be relevant if a general equity bear market were to begin in the near future.
On a related matter, the only times when the owners of gold-mining stocks need to fear a general equity bear market are those times when the gold-mining sector has trended upward with the broad stock market during the 6-12 months prior to the start of the general equity bear market. Consequently, in the unlikely event that the current bull market in US equities continues for another 6-12 months and gold-mining stocks trend upward during that period, the gold-mining sector will then be vulnerable to the downward pull of a general equity decline.

Crude Oil Supply and Demand

Share Button
We don’t normally analyze the crude oil market. However, there has been a huge price move (which may not be complete yet). With the endless rumors of deals that explain the move, we thought we would look at the spreads. The data shows a startling picture.
You should approach supply and demand in this market similarly to gold and silver. The difference is that there is very little inventory buffered in the system. Notwithstanding what you read about China “buying up” the oil to take advantage of “cheap” prices, oil requires specialized storage facilities. There is a significant cost to store it, and finite capacity too.
Below is a 3D graph of the futures curve taken at various times, from before the crash through January 9. Each line represents the curve at a given moment. Red lines are where there is backwardation. Yellow is a flat curve. And green indicates contango. Unlike our regular Supply and Demand Report for gold and silver, this shows just the price of various futures contracts and does not compare to the spot price. So here, backwardation is when a farther-out contract is cheaper than a nearer one. Contango is when the nearer one is cheaper. As with the monetary metals, backwardation is a sign of shortage, and contango is a sign of adequate or abundant supply.
Crude Futures Curves
You can see backwardation from May through September, with a gradual lessening of the slope. What really stands out is that, abruptly, the backwardation disappeared.
Here is another graph, showing the total spread included in each future curve (measured in dollars per barrel).
Crude Futures Speads
In May, there was nearly a $5 premium of the near contact over the distant contract. Now, there is over a $3 premium for the distant one. That is a picture of a market in shortage turning into a market without a shortage.
Contango is normal. It costs to store oil, and so if you want someone to deliver it to you 7 months out, you will have to pay him to cover this cost plus a profit. Otherwise why should he do that for you? When you buy a futures contract, that is what you are ordering—storage and delivery on a date.
Here is a graph of the price. The correlation to the changing spread is obvious.

Gold Stocks: Rally Acceleration!

Stewart Thomson

  1. I expect global jewellery demand to support consistently higher gold prices, well into the month of February. That’s partly because Chinese stock markets had a tremendous performance in 2014.
  2. Investors in China appear keen to celebrate the New Year by purchasing enormous amounts of gold jewellery.

  3. Please click here now. That’s the daily gold chart. A key breakout has occurred, and gold should make its way to $1350 over the next month or two.

  4. Please click here now. I’ve predicted that trading volume in China’s gold markets will surpass the volume on the COMEX over the next two to three years.
  5. As that happens, I expect gold to trade with less volatility, but horrific geopolitical events involving Al Qaeda and ISIS could bring brief periods of time where gold trades “wildly” higher, and then sharply lower.

  6. As powerful as Chinese demand is, I think most gold investors are underestimating what could become an even bigger source of demand and gold price discovery, which is Dubai.

  7. Please click here now. Dubai is launching a new gold jewellery expansion program, targeting international businesses (B2B).

  8. I expect that program will drive gold demand much higher than the bearish bullion bank economists are expecting. Dubai is known as the “City of Gold”, and I’m predicting it ultimately dwarfs London, New York, Shanghai, and Singapore in gold trading volume.

  9. In the big picture, it’s only fitting that the world’s primary centre of gold price discovery should be in Dubai, the city of gold.

  10. Most bank economists have only a mildly negative outlook for gold in 2015. ANZ and TD bank are bullish, and focused on jewellery demand!

  11. Also, Bloomberg News quotes Barclays economists this morning with this statement, “The lows of this year and next are likely to offer attractive entry-level prices for the longer-term investor.” – Suki Cooper and Kevin Norrish, Barclays economists, January 12, 2015.

  12. As 2014 began, the gold bears at the banks sounded more like financial terrorists than economists, and many investors in the Western gold community became extremely frightened. Some even became bitter, regretting their involvement with gold stocks.

  13. The good news is that the tone of the gold bears has changed dramatically, in recent months. Also, their predictions of drastically lower prices based on the tapering of QE failed to materialize. I think their predictions this year of lower gold prices based on rate hikes will meet a similar fate.

  14. Please click here now. The Indian wedding season officially begins in just two days, on January 15, and that should add more support to the gold price.

  15. Please click here now. The Indian government is under tremendous pressure from hundreds of thousands of jewellers, to cut the import duties.

  16. It’s time to bring the world’s largest gold jewellery industry out of the control of the Indian mafia, and into Narendra Modi’s “Make in India” hands. I’m predicting that India will build Dubai-certified refineries over the next three years. They will sign huge supply contracts with many of the Western gold community’s favourite mining companies!

  17. There’s more good news for all gold stock enthusiasts. Please click here now. Lower oil prices that help lower the cost of mining should now bring serious attention to gold stocks, from many institutional investors.

  18. Regardless of whether gold ends the year a bit higher or a bit lower, I think gold stocks could have a stellar year.

  19. On that note, please click here now. That’s the GDX daily chart. The volume is bullish.

  20. Note the position of the 14,7,7 series Stochastics oscillator, at the bottom of the chart. It’s overbought, with the lead line at about 90.

  21. The most reliable price breakouts tend to occur with the daily chart oscillator in this type of overbought condition. I was looking for a two day consecutive close over $20.50 to bring significant hedge fund investment into GDX, and as of yesterday’s close, that’s now in play.

  22. Please click here now . That’s the GDX monthly chart. Even a bearish technician should be open to a rally towards the upper channel line in the $25 - $26 area.

  23. Please click here now. That’s the weekly GDXJ chart. Watch the $30 price zone carefully.

  24. A two day consecutive close about $30 should bring hedge funds into junior gold stocks, igniting a strong GDXJ rally to $45!

The Bull Market is Back – at Least in Non-USD Terms

The gold price most traders are focused on is the dollar price of gold – this is no wonder, as the COMEX is the most important price setting market for gold, and gold is internationally mainly traded in dollars. It is often useful to abandon this dollar-centric view, as for the rest of the world’s population gold’s trend in local currencies is obviously of greater importance.
Since gold is primarily a monetary asset, the main question for someone residing in a European or Asian country is whether the purchasing power of gold is increasing against the purchasing power of the domestic fiat currency. Interest rates (better: real interest rates) naturally play an important role in this, as their height determines the greatest portion of the opportunity cost of holding gold (the remainder is related to storage costs and where applicable, insurance costs).

This is not A final shot, needs Coasters from 616 To fill in right 2


As the chart further below shows, due to the recent combination of dollar and gold strength, gold has broken out, respectively entered an uptrend, in euro and yen terms over the past year. In dollar terms, a similar breakout over lateral resistance has yet to occur. However, experience shows that the gold price in foreign currency terms often leads the US dollar gold price, which is why it makes sense to keep an eye on such developments.
Even in USD terms a few higher lows have been put in recently and the 50 day moving average has turned up after declining for several months, so the technical picture has improved somewhat, if in fits and starts. It is still too early to rule out an eventual final washout to the “technical attractor”, which is the 2008 high near $1,040, but the probability of this happening in the near term has decreased significantly.
This is also suggested by the recent trend in gold’s “real price”, i.e., its trend relative to commodities. Gold has bottomed against commodities in April of 2014, and the new uptrend in this ratio has recently accelerated. This is important for two reasons: for one thing, it is a subtle sign of declining economic confidence, which is quite in contrast to the performance of the stock market, but seems to be confirmed by the action in treasury bonds. Secondly, an increase in the gold price relative to commodities usually indicates that the profit margins of gold mining companies are rising as well. The gold sector tends to exhibit a long term negative correlation with the stock market (even though the two can often trend in the same direction over shorter time horizons) precisely because the earnings of gold mining companies tend to rise just as the earnings of other companies are coming under pressure.

1-Gold in various currenciesGold in dollar, euro and yen terms. In dollar terms the recent uptrend still looks quite weak, but in terms of euro and yen it looks like a solid reversal has been put in place – click to enlarge.

2-Gold vs commodities
Gold relative to commodities: the “real price” of gold has been in an uptrend since April 2014, and this has recently been confirmed by a breakout in the ratio above a consolidation area that it has spent several months in. The most recent move higher was mainly a result of the decline in crude oil prices – click to enlarge.

Gold Stocks Closing in on Resistance

Last year we discussed the squall of panic selling in gold stocks in late October /early November more or less in real time in great detail (see: “An Anti-Bubble Blow-Off in the Gold Sector”). As we pointed out, the decline had all the hallmarks of a capitulation, and in hindsight it has turned that at least “a” low was indeed put in right then and there. This was followed by a retest in December – the time when retail tax loss selling in weak sectors is most pronounced. The early November low was established shortly after the bulk of institutional tax loss selling was done.
Since then, the gold sector has recovered somewhat, exhibiting relative strength versus gold in the process. It is now approaching a zone of resistance formed by the 2013 and early 2014 lows. Obviously, a move above this resistance zone would be a good sign, but it is probably going to involve some backing and filling, even if it does eventually happen.
We want to briefly comment on the fact that a number of gold stocks have recently received downgrades. To our mind these downgrades are probably a late cycle contrarian phenomenon, mainly because they make no sense at this juncture. We should rephrase that: they only make sense if one not only assumes that gold will resume its decline, but also that the decline will exceed the expansion in gold mining margins that has been underway in recent quarters and has noticeably accelerated in Q 4 2014.
Energy is a major input cost in gold mining (especially for open pit mines) and the cost of energy has just declined rather precipitously, concurrently with a recovery in the gold price. Other input costs are falling as well. The once tight labor situation in the mining sector has become a lot more relaxed due to the decline in gold and commodity prices since 2011. Demand for inputs like industrial tires, chemical reagents, timber, steel, etc. has decreased with the softening of the global economy and the prices for these items have come down as a result.
Let us just say that there have surely been better moments to downgrade gold stocks. The potentially most useful of these opportunities were not recognized at the time they presented themselves. On the contrary, we recall that in the weeks just prior to gold’s 2011 peak, numerous upgrades were dispensed.

3-HUIThe HUI Index and the HUI-gold ratio. The lateral support/resistance lines are derived from highs and lows further in the past – click to enlarge.

Conclusion:

Since gold has not broken above resistance in dollar terms yet and gold stocks still have to achieve a solid breakout as well, the signs that a medium/ long term bottom may be in are still tentative. However, the technical backdrop has clearly improved in light of gold entering an uptrend in major foreign currencies and against commodities. This is more or less in line with what happened at the beginning of the bull market in 2000-2001 (incidentally, the ratios of gold stocks to the broad stock market and various other market sectors have recently returned to the levels of 2000 and turned up from there).
The fundamental backdrop for gold is not unambiguously bullish yet – just as some indicators have turned more bullish, others have turned more bearish, leaving an overall neutral situation in place. So there is still a wide range of possible outcomes, but considering the capitulation-like declines seen late last year, it seems to us that short to medium term strength in the sector is more likely.
The Oil-Drenched Black Swan, Part 4: The Head-Fake Disruption Ahead  

Add these factors up and we conclude there is no visible price limit on oil after supply falters.

I've been discussing the concept of an Oil Head-Fake since 2008.
 

The basic idea is straightforward: as global demand slackens, oil producers are incapable of reducing supply due to their dependence on oil revenues. This leads to oversupply which further depresses prices, to the point that marginal wells are shut off and costly exploration-development projects are shelved.
This process is far from orderly, as the low prices destabilize oil-dependent governments and regions. Geopolitical turmoil is only half the story; the immense mountain of debt that's been built on the collateral of oil collapses as cash-starved borrowers default on bonds and loans. This meltdown of oil-based debt then destabilizes an increasingly fragile global financial system.
Supply can be turned off easily enough, but it can't be expanded as easily. Costly deepwater wells that were shelved in the price bust can be restarted, but it takes many years to bring these hyper-expensive projects online.
Meanwhile, existing production declines without constant injections of capital and expertise. Contrary to popular conception that oil flows for decades without having to do anything other than poke a hole in the ground, oil fields need huge investments of capital to maintain high production: carbon dioxide or water must be injected into the wells, and so on.
So even if fields are kept online through the price bust, their production will decline as capital spending dries up.

The end result of the price bust is impaired supply: impaired by depletion, impaired by reduced investment, impaired by the collapse of oil-based debt.
Even if demand only remains constant, the price of oil will rise as supply falls. And with several billion people aspiring to the energy-intensive middle-class lifestyle of the developed world, we can anticipate global demand rising even if it stagnates in the developed world.
The price drop is a head-fake: it doesn't usher in a new era of permanently cheap oil. Rather, it unleashes dynamics that impair supply on multiple levels: geophysical, geopolitical, demographic and financial.
When supply cannot be jacked up to meet demand, prices will rise. As I have noted before, demand is somewhat elastic in the developed world--business meetings can be done online, vacations can be postponed, car pools can reduce single-driver trips, and so on.
In the developing world, the entrepreneur who uses his motorcycle to earn his livelihood doesn't have an alternative; if the price of a liter of fuel doubles, he has no choice but to pay it.
In other words, as the number of people who depend on oil rises, the elasticity of demand declines accordingly. Higher prices may not reduce demand in the way conventional economic models expect.

The oil-exporting nations have introduced another disruptive dynamic: fuel subsidies for their domestic markets. These fuel subsidies are political bribes to the citizenry chafing under the poverty and powerlessness of life in oil-financed kleptocracies.
Simple supply and demand dictates the destabilizing result of these generous subsidies: the cheap fuel is squandered and demand soars. Many of the nations that heavily subsidize fuel are facing the evaporation of their oil exports as domestic demand absorbs more of their total production.
This dynamic will force kleptocracies into a double-bind: if they end the subsidies, they face destabilizing domestic unrest. If they continue the subsidies, they lose their oil exports and income needed to service their debt, fund their welfare states and armed forces.
Either way, the kleptocracies implode, and in the resulting turmoil capital investment in their oil production will plummet, further reducing supply.
Add these factors up and we conclude there is no visible price limit on oil after supply falters. If I need two liters of petrol to make money for food today, I will pay whatever it takes. $200/barrel oil is no impediment because I need those few liters to earn my livelihood.

The Hidden Perils of Low Interest Rates

John Browne


Late last year, with the U.S. economy experiencing falling unemployment and seemingly low inflation, observers were extremely confident that the Federal Reserve would move judiciously in 2015 to restore 'normal' interest rates sooner rather than later. However, in light of the recent fall in both stocks and oil, that conviction has softened considerably.
Many, such as the very influential Bill Gross, now believe that our current Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP), which has been in place for six years, will remain in place throughout the year. While this likelihood is a disappointment to many, who would have preferred to see the economy move along without Fed-supplied training wheels, few really understand the pernicious effects these policies are inflicting on the economy the longer they are held in place. In short, ZIRP is slowly transforming the world economy into a dysfunctional basket case.
Historically, it has been estimated that a 'normal' fair rate of return on short to medium-term high quality debt is between 2 and 2.5 percent, net of inflation. Recently, the Fed published year-on-year U.S. CPI inflation for mid November 2014 at 1.3 percent. This would suggest normal short-term rates are at around 3.5 percent at present.
However, using the government's methodology that was in place prior to 1990, John Williams' Shadow Government Statistics (SGS) newsletter calculates inflation to be currently some 5 percent. Using methods in place prior to 1980, it is a staggering 9 percent. At that level, current interest rates should be somewhere around 11.0%. Even if we estimate that real inflation is currently 3%, then our "normal" rate of interest should be around 5%. This is some 50 times the rate paid currently on most bank deposits. This gap is distorting the economy in untold ways.
In early December 2014, the U.S. Congress approved further Government spending of some $1.1 trillion. This came just as the U.S. Treasury's debt broke through a total of $18 trillion. It wasn't that many months ago that the $17 trillion barrier was first breached.
Currently, the U.S. Treasury can borrow for 10 years at around a rate of 2 percent. But if long term rates rose to 5 percent, which would be in line with the historic range of "normal," the 3 percent difference would cost the Treasury an additional $540 billion in annual interest payments (based on the current $18 trillion in debt). This would considerably undermine the government's fiscal position, and necessitate an upheaval in federal budgeting.
The financial repercussions of a tripling or quadrupling of interest rates truly are horrific. They lead to a sense of foreboding that the Fed, aware acutely that the U.S. Treasury simply cannot afford a return to normal interest rates, will not restore normal rates unless forced to do so by international bond or currency markets. It appears, therefore, likely that ZIRP will continue for years to come. This feeling is underpinned by a view that low interest rates are simply a benign stimulant that fails to appreciate the actual harm they impose, particularly in the fixed income markets.
Savings are the prime source of real long-term investment. Today, savers are being crushed by the Fed's manipulation of interest rates to below a real return. To find even small real returns, investors have had to scour the financial landscape for sources of yield. In doing so, they have ventured into risky territory and have, for instance, flooded into the high yield market, pushing junk yields to record low territory. The repercussions of providing excess capital to risky businesses have yet to be experienced, but the energy industry should provide us with a hint of things to come. Over the last few years small and midsized energy firms were able to borrow cheaply and lavishly to fund drilling projects, thereby greatly increasing production. But in retrospect, these efforts look like they helped create an oversupply of energy that has depressed the price of crude and has exposed the energy sector to long-term financial stress. Bankruptcies and creditor losses may be inevitable.
Another concern of the Fed is that despite an unprecedented increase in liquidity and part-time employment, real job creation is still sluggish at best. Furthermore, the Manhattan Institute's Power & Growth Initiative Report of February 2014 notes that the U.S. oil and gas boom has created some one million jobs with a further ten million in associated occupations. The oil boom has improved net employment and kept the economy out of recession. But oil prices have fallen dramatically, threatening these economic bonuses and high-yield bond defaults. It's hard to see what other distortions and hidden pitfalls have been created by negative real rates. The traps often become visible only after they have been sprung.
But with major economies such as the European Union, Japan and Russia flirting with recession (and China slowing down considerably), there is growing fear that normal interest rates would be dangerous at present. This fear likely will encourage the maintenance of ZIRP, possibly for years, with financial markets disconnected increasingly from the real economy.
Therefore, investors may continue to benefit for some time from the consistent boosting of financial markets by central banks. However, the longer a major correction or even a crash takes to develop, the more sudden, deep and devastating it may be.